<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband Blues</title>
	<link>http://blog.bellhead.net/broadband-blues/</link>
	<description>demultiplexing the telecom network</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bellhead.net - &#187; The n Dimensions of NN</title>
		<link>http://blog.bellhead.net/broadband-blues/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>bellhead.net - &#187; The n Dimensions of NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bellhead.net/broadband-blues/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>[...] I hate the term Network Neutrality. It has to much emotional baggage and tries to make it a binary issue. I wish it were that simple because it personally stirs my emotions and I would love a simple switch to flip and make the problem go away. I bring the topic up again as the recent Freedom to Connect conference has spurred some great thought and got me thinking as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I hate the term Network Neutrality. It has to much emotional baggage and tries to make it a binary issue. I wish it were that simple because it personally stirs my emotions and I would love a simple switch to flip and make the problem go away. I bring the topic up again as the recent Freedom to Connect conference has spurred some great thought and got me thinking as well. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
 
